Buying in for the minimum is generally done by players who feel a little less confident with their poker skills or game. Reducing the amount of overall risk to their bankroll and playing as a shortstack allow a player to make simple math based decisions. With fewer difficult decisions to make post flop the ability to maneuver around a pot will be in some respects controlled by pot odds. More experienced players will tend to give players who buy-in short less respect when it comes to skill.
A maximum buy-in is for experienced players who like to play poker as deepstacked as possible. With more money behind they can apply more pressure to players with similar stack sizes. It also allows a player to take full advantage of their hand range by allowing them to call with speculative hands preflop instead of having to play a nittier game.
The optimal buy-in may be somewhere in between for you. If you are unsure of how a table is playing and unaware of table dynamics, it might be best to buy-in for a middling amount until you know the players in the game. This will limit some of the exposure your bankroll has and allow you to play a wider range of hands from various positions than if you only bought in for a minimal amount.
There are many different options and no one right answer. Whatever feels most comfortable for you is the amount you should buy-in for.
Curtis Steuber.


Menu
Categories







